THE PATRIARCHAL IMPLICATIONS IN THE CLEFT BY DORIS LESSING / DORIS LESSING’İN CLEFT ADLI ROMANINDA ATAERKİL İÇERİMLER

Zerrin EREN

Öz


In her novel titled The Cleft, Doris Lessing reverses the Creation myths by depicting women as the first humans. Although Lessing presents women as the first humans, a close reading of the novel displays that the writer uses to a great extent traditional gender stereotypes and gender roles. The aim of this paper is to discuss the patriarchal implications in The Cleft to determine the writer’s views concerning the gender role development theories in the last decade of her life. In the novel, the writer presents three periods at the beginning of the history of humans. In the first period, the laziness of the Clefts, the first women, is emphasized. During the presentation of the second and the third periods the reader witnesses the establishment of gender roles and gender role differentiation. This gender role differentiation is presented as a consequence of different innate natures of females and males. The characteristics of the females and the males depicted in the novel are the same with patriarchal gender stereotypical traits. By doing so, Lessing may have indicated that gender stereotypical traits and roles are not culturally constructed, and they are not learned, but they are the inherent characteristics of females and males. This may imply that Lessing may have adopted the sociobiological accounts of gender role development, at least in the last decade of her life-span.


Anahtar Kelimeler


Lessing; Cleft; gender roles; gender stereotypes; patriarchy.

Tam Metin:

PDF (English)

Referanslar


BASCH, Francoise (1974). Relative Creatures: Victorian Women in Society and the Novel. New York: Schocken.

BASOW, Susan A. (1992). Gender Stereotypes and Roles. California: Brooks/Cole.

BIEDERMANN, Hans (1996). The Wordsworth Dictionary of Symbolism. trans. James Hulbert. Hertfordshire: Wordsworth.

BROVERMAN, Inge K. & BROVERMAN, Donald M. et al. (1970). “Sex-Role Stereotypes and Clinical Judgments of Mental Health”. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 34 (1): 1-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0028797 [03.03.2016].

CANCIAN, Francesca M. & OLIKER, Stacey J. (2000). Caring and Gender. Walnut Creek: Altamira.

COON, Dennis & MITTERER, John O. (2007). Introduction to Psychology: Gateways to Mind and Behavior USA: Thomson Wadsworth. 11th ed.

DURKIN, Kevin (2005). “Children’s Understanding of Gender Roles in Society”. Children’s Understanding of Society. Eds. Martyn Barrett-Eithne Buchanan-Barrow. Hove: Psychology Press. 135-167.

KITE, Mary E. & DEAUX, Kay, et al. (2008). “Gender Stereotypes”. Psychology of Women: Handbook of Issues and Theories. Eds. Florence L. Denmark and Michele A. Paludi. Westport: Praeger. 205-236. 2nd ed.

LEE, Hermione (2009). “A Conversation with Doris Lessing”, Wasafiri, 24(3): 18-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02690050903069603 [15.09.2015].

LESSING, Doris (2008). The Cleft. London: Harper Perennial.

LETTMAIER, Saskia (2010). The Action for Breach of Promise of Marriage and the Feminine Ideal, 1800-1940. New York: OUP.

McCLAIN, Carol S. (1995). “Reinterpreting Women in Healing Roles”. Women as Healers. ed. Carol S. McClain New Brumswick: Rutgers University Press. 1-20.

MYLONAS, George. E. (1946). “The Eagle of Zeus”. The Classical Journal. 41(5): 203-207. http://www.jstor.org/stable 3291884 [2.12.2015].

Nobelprize.org. “The Nobel Prize in Literature 2007”. http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/literature/laureates/2007/ [12.11.2015].

PRENTICE, Deborah A. & CARRANZA, Erica (2002). “What Women and Men Should Be, Shouldn’t Be, Are Allowed To Be, And Don’t Have to Be: The Contents of Prescriptive Gender Stereotypes”. Psychology of Women Quarterly. 26: 269-281. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-6402.t01-1-00066 [03.03.2016].

ROUNTREE, Cathleen (2008). “A Thing of Temperament: An Interview with Doris Lessing, London, May 16, 1998”. Jung Journal: Culture and Psyche. 2 (1): 62-77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/jung.2008.2.1.62 [12.11.2015].

RUSKIN, John (1906). Sesame and Lilies: Three Lectures. Leipzig: Bernard Tauchnitz.


Refback'ler

  • Şu halde refbacks yoktur.


Telif Hakkı (c) 2016 Selçuk Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi (SEFAD) / Selçuk University Journal of Faculty of Letters

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.